The doctrine of res judicata requires that a party should not be allowed to file same matter repeatedly against the other party either in the same court or in other competent court and that the decision given by one court should be accepted as final subject to any appeal…
Mr. X was dismissed from service by his employer after a proper enquiry. Mr. X challenged his dismissal in High Court by a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, the High Court dismissed the petition citing that Mr. X has an alternative remedy available. Mr. X took recourse to the alternative remedy before the appropriate forum, but Mr. X's legal action is opposed by the employer on the basis of res judicata. Based on these facts, which of the following is the most appropriate?
Click an option to submit your answer.
More CLAT 2021 Legal questions to practise
From the passage: It is essential to the creation of a contract that both parties should...
Practise this question →From the passage: Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 reads as follows: Communica...
Practise this question →From the passage: It is essential to the creation of a contract that both parties should...
Practise this question →From the passage: It is essential to the creation of a contract that both parties should...
Practise this question →From the passage: It is essential to the creation of a contract that both parties should...
Practise this question →From the passage: It is essential to the creation of a contract that both parties should...
Practise this question →From the passage: Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 reads as follows: Communica...
Practise this question →From the passage: Compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule of appoi...
Practise this question →